Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 14:54:10 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: SADA Kenji <sada@bsdclub.org> Cc: bmc@WillsCreek.COM, ports@FreeBSD.org, ust@cert.siemens.de, nectar@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sysutils/fileutils Message-ID: <20000718145409.A2271@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <200007161728.CAA98645@home.bsdclub.org>; from sada@bsdclub.org on Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 02:28:29AM %2B0900 References: <200007161209.IAA64549@tributary.inside.willscreek.com> <200007161728.CAA98645@home.bsdclub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 02:28:29AM +0900, SADA Kenji wrote:
> >> If the functionality provided by gnuls is now provided by the larger
> >> fileutils port, then I certainly can find no reason to object about the
> >> removal of the gnuls port.
>
> So I'll remove misc/gnuls.
There was resistance, and it made sence. So IMHO it should stay.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Disclaimer: Not speaking for FreeBSD, just expressing my own opinion.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000718145409.A2271>