Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 10 Aug 2000 17:16:38 -0400
From:      Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
To:        Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: 3ware and RAID0 vs RAID 1 
Message-ID:  <4.3.2.7.0.20000810171454.04748db0@marble.sentex.ca>
In-Reply-To: <200008102121.OAA01408@mass.osd.bsdi.com>
References:  <Your message of "Thu, 10 Aug 2000 16:17:19 EDT." <4.3.2.7.0.20000810160701.0310bf00@marble.sentex.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 02:21 PM 8/10/00 -0700, Mike Smith wrote:

>Newfs isn't a representative case with these cards, as newfs doesn't
>align the data it writes and the driver has to copy the data around
>(expensive).  The array itself should still perform pretty well (read
>speeds should be pretty good especially).

Actually, on a 128M system, it died while doing a 500M bonnie write.. i.e. 
it just hung there.  I will test some more tomorrow when back at the office 
and provide more info.

Aug 10 16:16:46 smtp4 /kernel: twed0: <3ware RAID unit> on twe0
Aug 10 16:16:46 smtp4 /kernel: twed0: 14323MB (29334784 sectors)

         ---Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Tancsa,                                      tel +1 519 651 3400
Sentex Communications                             mike@sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada                         www.sentex.net



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.0.20000810171454.04748db0>