Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 14:32:45 -0700 From: Ron 'The InSaNe One' Rosson <insane@lunatic.oneinsane.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: -ssl Ports Message-ID: <20000823143244.A36013@lunatic.oneinsane.net> In-Reply-To: <20000823232421.A16053@mithrandr.moria.org>; from nbm@mithrandr.moria.org on Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 11:24:22PM %2B0200 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0008231558540.15857-100000@sneakerz.org> <20000823232421.A16053@mithrandr.moria.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Neil Blakey-Milner was heard blurting out:
> On Wed 2000-08-23 (16:01), Lawrence N. King wrote:
> > Should new/current -ssl ports be integrated with their existing
> > counterparts or should they remain separate?
>
> I'd propose doing master ports like vim5 and vim-lite, and w3m and
> w3m-ssl. w3m/w3m-ssl is a good example.
>
I would like to see it done with if fepends lines so when you run make
you do something like so:
make -DWITH_SSL
There should be no reason why we could not do it that way. Have you ever
tried navigating in the /usr/ports/www directory with a person who is
tab-key dependent. ;-)
TIA
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Rosson ... and a UNIX user said ...
The InSaNe One rm -rf *
insane@oneinsane.net and all was /dev/null and *void()
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You, you, and you: panic. The rest of you, come with me.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000823143244.A36013>