Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2000 15:49:01 -0700 (MST) From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The shared /bin and /sbin bikeshed Message-ID: <200011112249.PAA08960@nomad.yogotech.com> In-Reply-To: <20001111144604.B21664@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200011110257.eAB2vj034258@vashon.polstra.com> <200011110315.eAB3Fp909237@mass.osd.bsdi.com> <200011111854.LAA04008@nomad.yogotech.com> <20001111144604.B21664@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > For awhile, GCC's internal compiler libraries were compiled shared, but > > the speedups from compiling them static were significant enough to show > > static linking is *significantly* faster than shared linking, even if > > you remove the startup issues. > > Hate to say this, but GCC 3.0 will most likely use a shared libgcc. [ FWIW, it wasn't libgcc that I was speaking of, but the actual libraries for the language. However.... ] Are we *forced* to use it? I would think we have the ability to choose to make it static if we so desire. Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200011112249.PAA08960>