Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 13:02:15 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> To: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: dynamic vs static sysctls? Message-ID: <200101192102.f0JL2F698129@earth.backplane.com> References: <200101192057.aa79706@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:
:There's also mount(2). NFS export lists are passed to the filesystem
:via a special mount call this way. It's hardly an interface designed
:to be extensible, but it does go straight to the filesystem from
:a syscall.
:
:Ian
Yup. Though mount is black magic. I'd avoid messing with its
interface, the locking issues will drive you nuts.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200101192102.f0JL2F698129>