Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 10:50:27 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG, jlemon@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: somaxconn and foot removal Message-ID: <20010211105027.P3274@fw.wintelcom.net> In-Reply-To: <200102111828.NAA09777@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:28:52PM -0500 References: <20010211015516.J3274@fw.wintelcom.net> <200102111828.NAA09777@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> [010211 10:29] wrote: > <<On Sun, 11 Feb 2001 01:55:16 -0800, Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> said: > > > A) So, do we bump the sockets to use 'int' for so->so_qlimit? > > Make it be `u_short'. (Actually, I'm not sure why all three of those > members aren't unsigned. It would make more sense that way.) This still gives misleading results from sysctl, ie sysctl allows setting to 65539 which results in a real somaxconn of 3. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010211105027.P3274>