Date: Fri, 04 May 2001 15:19:35 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> To: Makoto MATSUSHITA <matusita@jp.freebsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Any chance of release patch being committed? Message-ID: <35826.988982375@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 May 2001 20:38:06 %2B0900." <20010504203806U.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 04 May 2001 20:38:06 +0900, Makoto MATSUSHITA wrote:
> All of examples are just "we want yet another *generic* kernel for
> specific machines".
>
> Why you don't replace src/sys/${arch}/conf/GENERIC file to your own
> (customized) version? It is too simple, and matches your requirements.
Because that's a repo-backed file. Why make me manage CVS conflicts on
update? Why not just allow something like RELEASE_KERNCONF? What's the
real objection to it? So far, all I've heard is "Gee, I've never needed
that". :-)
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?35826.988982375>