Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 13:02:29 -0700 From: "L. Peter Deutsch" <ghost@aladdin.com> To: mi@aldan.algebra.com Cc: kellyzg@hotmail.com, ports@freebsd.org, andreas@freebsd.org, raph@artofcode.com, jseger@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GhostScript and JPEG Message-ID: <200105152002.NAA01514@aladdin.com> In-Reply-To: <200105151806.f4FI6Yr26882@misha.privatelabs.com> References: <200105151806.f4FI6Yr26882@misha.privatelabs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> My understanding is, no. To produce a non-compliant jpeg, you need the > value of C_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU (Compress) increased. D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU > is for the Decompressor. > ... I think it is safe to bump up D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU. I agree. D_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU, which affects only decompression, should be increased; C_MAX_BLOCKS_IN_MCU should stay the same. Neither the PostScript spec nor Adobe compatibility requires the ability to *produce* non-compliant JPEG data. Ghostscript only needs to be able to *read* non-compliant data. -- L. Peter Deutsch | Aladdin Enterprises | 203 Santa Margarita Ave. ghost@aladdin.com | http://www.aladdin.com | Menlo Park, CA 94025 The future of software is at http://www.opensource.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200105152002.NAA01514>