Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 11 Jun 2001 18:01:49 -0700
From:      dannyman <dannyman@toldme.com>
To:        Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>
Cc:        doc@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Porter's Handbook ambiguity
Message-ID:  <20010611180149.A96271@toldme.com>
In-Reply-To: <20010612005343.B972F3E0B@bazooka.unixfreak.org>; from dima@unixfreak.org on Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 05:53:43PM -0700
References:  <20010611174736.D95102@tellme.com> <20010612005343.B972F3E0B@bazooka.unixfreak.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 05:53:43PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote:
> Danny Howard <dannyman@tellme.com> writes:

> > Please use portlint to see if your port conforms to our guidelines. The
> > portlint program is part of the ports collection. In particular, you may
> > want to check if the Makefile is in the right shape and the package is
> > named appropriately.
> > 
> > Okay, but where is portlint?  How do I use it?
[...]
> "Part of the ports collection" means it's a port.
> 
> 	dima@bazooka% make search name=portlint
> 	Port:   portlint-2.3.2
> 	Path:   /usr/ports/devel/portlint
[...]

Perhaps this section ought to be reworded.  Something like: "Please use
the portlint port (devel/portlint) to see if your port conforms to our
guidelines.

"Part of the ports collection" is easily misinterpreted, or at least it
was in my case.  Should I send-pr something?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010611180149.A96271>