Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 5 Aug 2001 00:17:42 +0100
From:      Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org>
To:        "Chad R. Larson" <chad@DCFinc.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Bill Moran <wmoran@iowna.com>
Subject:   Re: RELENG_4_3 calls itself -RELEASE?
Message-ID:  <01080500174200.00489@spatula.home>
In-Reply-To: <20010804141323.D16994@freeway.dcfinc.com>
References:  <20010803135402.94163.qmail@web14001.mail.yahoo.com> <3B6BFF94.F11BBACE@iowna.com> <20010804141323.D16994@freeway.dcfinc.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 04 August 2001 10:13 pm, Chad R. Larson wrote:
> Just as an aside, the FreeBSD project and core group seem to have an
> enormous resistance to changing how anything is done.  There's a
> "we've always done it this way, it works for us, if you can't figure
> it out--tough" attitude.  That may be a Good Thing, as it brings
> stability to the project and we all don't wind up chasing the Latest
> Thing.  But just don't be disappointed if this whole thread results
> in no changes.  I don't think I've ever seen change initiated by
> non-committers.

I think there is probably some amount of truth in this. I feel FreeBSD is 
very conservative in nature, and there is a healthy resistance to change. But 
that is no reason to presume that core are unreceptive, just that change will 
have to make a very good case. :-)

Going back to the case in hand, we have had a 3-point naming scheme before. 
See 2.2.6-R, 2.2.7-R etc.. And going back to that system might confuse 
matters, as we used to call development branches by two digits (eg 2.2) and 
now it is just one (eg 3 and 4). Going back to 3 digit release numbers 
(4.4.1) might confuse people, and is probably something best avoided.

Seeing as Jordan and Kris have agreed to change the name, I definately feel 
that 4.4-RELEASE-p1 or similar makes the best sense all round, as patches to 
(but no extra functionality) 4.4-RELEASE is exactly what RELENG_4_4 is. Plus 
it doesn't sound more secure as -SECURITY would, and will always become 
lexically bigger as the patch level increases.

-- 
Andrew Boothman <andrew@cream.org>
http://sour.cream.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?01080500174200.00489>