Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:38:21 +0200 From: Johann Visagie <johann@egenetics.com> To: ftpq@tranchant.freeserve.co.uk Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: wrong ftpq version! Message-ID: <20010905133820.F52406@fling.sanbi.ac.za> In-Reply-To: <200109041346.f84DkvH01197@dymwsm10.mailwatch.com>; from mtranch2@ford.com on Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 09:46:20AM -0400 References: <200109041346.f84DkvH01197@dymwsm10.mailwatch.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tranchant, Mark (M.A.) on 2001-09-04 (Tue) at 09:46:20 -0400: > > I maintain ftpq: > > http://www.tranchant.freeserve.co.uk/ftpq.html > > FreeBSD has been keeping its port of this up to date for a long > time. However, I've recently split the development into a stable and a > development branch. Despite warnings all over my web page, you guys have > taken the unstable 1.10 version for your port. > > Please don't do this - stick with 1.04 (needs a similar patch to move > sys/types.h up the #include order), or wait 24 hours and pull down 1.05, > which should compile without modification. Thanks for letting us know... > How can I ensure you take an appropriate stable version in future, whilst > still releasing very unstable evaluation and development versions? Question to the -ports list: Is it worth going to the trouble of doing a repo copy and maintaining both ftpq and ftpq-devel ports, or would it be better simply to downgrade the ftpq port to 1.05 and bump PORTEPOCH? -- V To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010905133820.F52406>