Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 27 Sep 2001 10:25:33 -0400
From:      Technical Information <tech_info@threespace.com>
To:        FreeBSD Chat <chat@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Another article, from the "other side" 
Message-ID:  <4.3.2.7.2.20010927100849.017f9938@threespace.com>
In-Reply-To: <200109271345.f8RDjn116287@dungeon.home>
References:  <4.3.2.7.2.20010927003714.01819658@threespace.com> <20010926072915.A30655@blackhelicopters.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20010924170815.0180aee8@threespace.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20010924191808.0227cf28@threespace.com> <3BAFD532.6ED7A320@duth.gr> <4.3.2.7.2.20010926015428.01814630@threespace.com> <20010926125046.C1370@lpt.ens.fr> <20010926070519.A30531@blackhelicopters.org> <20010926132021.E1370@lpt.ens.fr> <20010926072915.A30655@blackhelicopters.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20010927003714.01819658@threespace.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 09:45 AM 9/27/2001, Stephen McKay wrote:
>Do they discuss the earlier American funding for bin Laden and American
>funding of the Taliban (as recently as May this year)?  I'm genuinely
>curious.  I'm not trying to argue any particular point here.  I'm quite
>interested in how much (or how little) the American public is being
>manipulated.

I didn't have time to do a thorough search, but I quickly found the 
following link.  I used CNN because it's apparently the favorite news 
source of everyone on this list.

http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/central/09/15/amanpour.taliban/index.html

While this short blurb doesn't mention the extent of the financial support, 
it makes no secret of it.  And I don't think anyone has tried to make 
secret of it.  In fact, I think it just raises most Americans' ire that 
much more to think of al Qaida's turning on us like this.



>As I said, I think the only way to reduce terrorism is to change your
>foreign policy.  That might be why you read about it so much.  Others
>have said the same as I have.
>
>Of course, many nations should change their aggressive foreign policies,
>but the US could be the leaders.  I rate the chances low, unfortunately.

I rewrote this paragraph four times before I finally decided to just say 
this: Many of the same countries and governments that decry U.S. 
involvement in their affairs are quick to take funds/assistance from the 
U.S. or attempt to do trade with us.  And in my mind, that's completely 
hypocritical.  You can't have it both ways.

That may sound cynical or arrogant, but perhaps this editorial piece can 
state the sentiment more clearly.

http://threespace.com/ksmm/america.html

--Chip Morton


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20010927100849.017f9938>