Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 16:48:31 +0100 (CET) From: Nils Holland <nils@tisys.org> To: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org> Cc: Tom Hukins <tom@FreeBSD.ORG>, <freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: portupgrade manpage Message-ID: <20011102164345.F588-100000@howie.ncptiddische.net> In-Reply-To: <20011102081536.A77305@blackhelicopters.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2 Nov 2001, Michael Lucas wrote: > Well, portupgrade is written in Ruby, so it can't be part of the base > system until Ruby is also. > > If you want to see truly spectacular flamage, go to -hackers and > suggest they import Ruby into the tree. But warn me first, so I can > unsubscribe. :-) No, I'd rather not do that. These flame wars tend to shorten people's lives, or even end people's lives abruptly. Seriously: What I was asking had nothing to do with portupgrade or Ruby belonging to the base system. I just wanted to ask if portupgrade's particular manpage is maintained by the DocProject, because although portupgrade is not part of the base system, it's somehow related coloser to the FreeBSD Project than, for example, lynx or apache. So, while I know that any documentation for the latter mentioned software comes directly from the producers of the software, I just thought that maybe the documentation for portupgrade was at least partly produced in conjunction with the DocProject. Since this is not so, I now know that I'd have to contact the maintainer directly if I wanted to report a problem with the software or its documentation. Greetings Nils Nils Holland Ti Systems - FreeBSD in Tiddische, Germany http://www.tisys.org * nils@tisys.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20011102164345.F588-100000>