Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 12:01:21 -0800 From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.org> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>, Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>, Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/gx if_gx.c if_gxreg.h if_gxvar.h Message-ID: <200111152001.fAFK1L915165@c527597-a.cstvl1.sfba.home.com> In-Reply-To: <20011115134623.S13393@elvis.mu.org> References: <200111150309.fAF39NO39993@freefall.freebsd.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0111142026260.67212-100000@beppo> <20011115084047.A1917@dragon.nuxi.com> <20011115134623.S13393@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_55362892P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii If memory serves me right, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * David O'Brien <obrien@FreeBSD.org> [011115 10:43] wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 14, 2001 at 08:26:39PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > > > > > > Jonathon- do me a favor- after a week or so, would you gc wx in -stable t > oo? > > > > So we don't break people's kernels on their next CVSup; we should > > probably just leave wx in RELENG_4. > > How about just leaving wx in GENERIC, and adding a commented out > gx entry? On a related topic, I ran across a related PR, bin/27087, in which the submitter thought that the ti and sk drivers should be in GENERIC. Anyone who's going to frob GENERIC for wx or gx probably knows what's the right thing to do about this PR too. Bruce. --==_Exmh_55362892P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1+ 05/14/2001 iD8DBQE79B8Q2MoxcVugUsMRAtCxAJ9KtskylYPlzOmpG/4PGfPaHBJ55ACfRbFf BOvL7YHbc2AxO24y3a2eCBk= =WEyR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_55362892P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200111152001.fAFK1L915165>