Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 07:26:15 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@csociety.org> To: Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>, Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/krb5-beta [...] Message-ID: <20020211122615.GU82640@squall.waterspout.com> In-Reply-To: <200202110319.g1B3JPu09732@cwsys.cwsent.com> References: <20020211015635.GB65324@madman.nectar.cc> <200202110319.g1B3JPu09732@cwsys.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Feb 10, 2002 at 07:18:53PM -0800, Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems Group wrote: > In message <20020211015635.GB65324@madman.nectar.cc>, "Jacques A. Vidrine" writes: I don't seem to remember getting this email, but... > > The krb5-beta port has no history [1]. This is a scratch port for > > people who want to beta test the next version of MIT Kerberos before > > it is released. When it is released, ports/security/krb5 will be > > updated as appropriate and this port will be removed again. In any case, intentionally putting a port in CVS for only a short period is a waste either way since one could just as easily request testers via the mailing list and this would work just as well. > > By contrast, a port called `krb5-devel' would be something different > > (such as a development branch from CVS) and _would_ require a > > repocopy. Maybe this is what you have in mind. > > I do have a "krb5-devel" port in mind, based on the daily krb5-current > snapshots. Yes, that will certainly require one. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020211122615.GU82640>