Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 May 2002 01:15:54 -0700
From:      Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org>
To:        Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>
Cc:        hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: __STDC__ removal?
Message-ID:  <20020529081554.GN17045@elvis.mu.org>
In-Reply-To: <20020529074217.07F30380A@overcee.wemm.org>
References:  <20020526222546.GD43189@elvis.mu.org> <20020529074217.07F30380A@overcee.wemm.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> [020529 00:42] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > NetBSD is nuking almost all __STDC__ usages because it's always
> > defined.  Do we want to do the same?  The exception I've seen
> > is for assembler files where old style C is needed to avoid
> > conflicts.
> 
> Umm, do we need it there in asm headers?  We do not use the traditional cpp
> for our assembler files.  I would be suprised if we needed it.  In fact, I
> would be suprised if we build with -traditional any more.

Well then we can nuke it from asm files too!  Whee!

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
 start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.'
Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020529081554.GN17045>