Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 13:27:35 -0400 From: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@unixdaemons.com> To: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: virtually contig jumbo mbufs (was Re: new zero copy sockets snapshot) Message-ID: <20020705132735.A873@unixdaemons.com> In-Reply-To: <200207051645.g65Gj1lM003467@vashon.polstra.com>; from jdp@polstra.com on Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 09:45:01AM -0700 References: <20020619090046.A2063@panzer.kdm.org> <20020705002056.A5365@unixdaemons.com> <20020704231321.A42134@panzer.kdm.org> <15653.35606.290023.621040@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <200207051645.g65Gj1lM003467@vashon.polstra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 09:45:01AM -0700, John Polstra wrote: > The BCM570x chips (bge driver) definitely need a single physically > contiguous buffer for each received packet. This is totally ridiculous for gigE hardware, IMO. Do you know of other cards that can't do scatter gather DMA? > John > -- > John Polstra > John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA > "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa Regards, -- Bosko Milekic bmilekic@unixdaemons.com bmilekic@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020705132735.A873>