Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 19:09:24 -0700 From: "Morgan Davis" <morgan.davis@hosting.com> To: "'Brooks Davis'" <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE? Message-ID: <000901c24593$1b940630$0600a8c0@space.lan> In-Reply-To: <20020816190318.A22458@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ah, yes. *default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4 Thanks for the explanation/reminder Brooks. --Morgan > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd- > stable@FreeBSD.ORG] On Behalf Of Brooks Davis > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 7:03 PM > To: Morgan Davis > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: uname reports 4.6-STABLE not 4.6.2-STABLE? > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 06:58:49PM -0700, Morgan Davis wrote: > > Is it normal for uname to not report the tertiary version number in the > > STABLE branch? It's been so long since we had a three digit release > > revision I can't recall. > > > > In the event it is normal, is there a way to determine the .2 > > maintenance level? Even /usr/src/UPDATING doesn't seem to have a line > > in there about the 4.6.2 RELEASE date. > > 4.6.2 is a snapshot of RELENG_4_6, the 4.6 security fix branch, not a > snapshot of RELENG_4, the 4.x branch so if you track RELENG_4, you won't > ever run 4.6.2. > > -- Brooks > > -- > Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. > PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?000901c24593$1b940630$0600a8c0>