Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 15:26:44 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: General: crypto in ports vs. RESTRICTED=... in Makefile Message-ID: <20030228132644.GA907@straylight.oblivion.bg> In-Reply-To: <20030217214540.GD71679@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <m3znovdu3f.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <20030217214540.GD71679@rot13.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 01:45:40PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 12:28:36PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > > Hi, > >=20 > > I recently added a "RESTRICTED" tag to ports/databases/db41 and added a > > db41-nocrypto port that uses the "nocrypto" version of DB 4.1.25.1. > >=20 > > Christian "naddy" Weisgerber asked whether this was right, I replied > > that I took that procedure from the Porter's Handbook (that says crypto > > code is to be tagged RESTRICTED), and Christian suggested that I take > > this up on ports then. > >=20 > > So here we stand... > >=20 > > What's the consensus on tagging ports that contain cryptographic code > > with "RESTRICTED"? Is this necessary, as documented in the Porter's > > handbook, or is this obsolete or incorrect (and if so, why, and where > > documented)? Is the port split into crypto and non-crypto correct? >=20 > See my reply on cvs-all. >=20 > The handbook is out of date. Would the attached patch be in order, then? G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 I am the thought you are now thinking. Index: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D RCS file: /home/ncvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml,v retrieving revision 1.286 diff -u -r1.286 book.sgml --- doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml 27 Feb 2003 15:39:= 58 -0000 1.286 +++ doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.sgml 28 Feb 2003 13:10:= 43 -0000 @@ -3177,18 +3177,8 @@ FTP.</para> =20 <para>Also set this if the application's license has general - restrictions on who may use it. Examples include:</para> - - <itemizedlist> - <listitem> - <para>The application is for non-commercial use only.</para> - </listitem> - - <listitem> - <para>The application contains cryptography code which is - forbidden in some countries.</para> - </listitem> - </itemizedlist> + restrictions on who may use it, e.g. the application is for + non-commercial use only.</para> </sect2> =20 <sect2> --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+X2OU7Ri2jRYZRVMRAvjZAJ0V4i1ChGMZdSzgHvmQlXneFNEpewCgu36U 0wZwQ2EihwMLXvVcfvJySC8= =ljpR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dDRMvlgZJXvWKvBx-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030228132644.GA907>