Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:30:39 +0200 From: Heinrich Rebehn <rebehn@ant.uni-bremen.de> To: Matthew Seaman <m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading to 4.9 CVS vs. binary? Message-ID: <3F72A7AF.9030905@ant.uni-bremen.de> In-Reply-To: <20030924123126.GA51968@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20030923172654.GA4981@silvertree.org> <20030923214255.GC76632@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <3F71840B.5000102@ant.uni-bremen.de> <20030924123126.GA51968@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 01:46:19PM +0200, Heinrich Rebehn wrote: > >>Is RELENG_4_9 already available at all? >> >>http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html >> >>does not mention it. That's why i am tracking RELENG_4. > > > Not yet. RELENG_4_9/4.9-RELEASE is expected in the near future. This > whole thread was a rare, but none the less welcome, example of people > making plans well in advance of taking action. > Yes, that should be done more often.. While we're at it: Will it be possible to upgrade from 4.9 to 5.x via CSV? Heinrich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F72A7AF.9030905>