Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:49:43 -0500 From: Richard Coleman <richardcoleman@mindspring.com> To: Melvyn Sopacua <freebsd-current@webteckies.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: 5.2-BETA and related ports issues Message-ID: <3FCA8217.4010602@mindspring.com> In-Reply-To: <200312010033.30577.freebsd-current@webteckies.org> References: <200311281553.hASFrURT003309@siralan.org> <xzpbrqtepp5.fsf@dwp.des.no> <3FCA6891.1020400@mindspring.com> <200312010033.30577.freebsd-current@webteckies.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Melvyn Sopacua wrote: > Isn't that *exactly why* ports should respect $PREFIX? At least than you know > that startup scripts are in one place. Maybe all that is needed is a variable > RCDIR?= etc/rc.d, for people who want to 'deviate' from this convention. I like that idea. That could work. But to make this seemless (in the case of RCDIR=/etc/rc.d), we would need to start adding the RCNG keywords to the startup scripts added by ports. Richard Coleman richardcoleman@mindspring.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FCA8217.4010602>