Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:23:58 -0800 (PST) From: Doug White <dwhite@gumbysoft.com> To: Doug Barton <DougB@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "current@freebsd.org" <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: userland|unprivileged file system handling tools Message-ID: <20040326122333.S61326@carver.gumbysoft.com> In-Reply-To: <20040324134715.N88409@qbhto.arg> References: <60523.24.0.61.35.1080081768.squirrel@webmail.linuxpowered.com> <20040324134715.N88409@qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, Doug Barton wrote: > > As far as -current goes, mknod is not anything worth mentioning because of > > devfs. > > I disagree with this assessment. mknod is still useful in -current, for > instance in a chroot setup where you only need one or two devices. Like which? :-) -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040326122333.S61326>