Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 18:24:29 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> To: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> Cc: Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com> Subject: Re: Multiple choices for RAID-0, best performance? Message-ID: <p0600208abd00b087078a@[10.0.1.3]> In-Reply-To: <20040624162016.GA76586@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> References: <40DAE792.1090701@anduin.net> <p06002085bd009afafa68@[10.0.1.3]> <20040624162016.GA76586@falcon.midgard.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 6:20 PM +0200 2004-06-24, Erik Trulsson wrote:
>> Check the archives for previous comments from Søren on this chipset.
>
> Which chipset? Silicon Image has made more than one SATA chipset. The
> SiI 3112 has been condemned around here as being a buggy piece of crap,
> but I haven't seen any such comments about the later SiI 3114, which is
> the one that all Tyan's dual-Opteron boards seem to use.
Sorry, I wasn't aware that they'd done multiple different
chipsets. You'd have to check the archives and/or ask Søren if you
want more details.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/>; for more info.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0600208abd00b087078a>