Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 18 Aug 2004 02:14:56 -0500
From:      Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [src] cvs commit: src/sys/sys param.h src/sys/conf newvers.sh
Message-ID:  <412301F0.2070307@alumni.rice.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20040818060547.GB6348@ip.net.ua>
References:  <200408180021.i7I0LCCK020175@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040818002136.03A8B16A524@hub.freebsd.org> <20040818060547.GB6348@ip.net.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/18/04 01:05, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 12:21:36AM +0000, Scott Long wrote:
>> Index: src/sys/sys/param.h
> 
> [...]
> 
>>   * scheme is:  <major><two digit minor><0 if release branch, otherwise 1>xx
>>   */
>>  #undef __FreeBSD_version
>> -#define __FreeBSD_version 502128	/* Master, propagated to newvers */
>> +#define __FreeBSD_version 600000	/* Master, propagated to newvers */
>                             ^^^^^^
> I believe this should be 600100, or are we changing the scheme
> again?

No, 600000 is correct.  The reason is that 600100 will be used for 
6-CURRENT *after* a 6.0-RELEASE.  6-CURRENT before and *including* 
6.0-RELEASE should follow the 6000xx scheme.  Note that this is 
unchanged from the way 5-CURRENT and 5.0-RELEASE (which ended up being 
500043) were handled:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/freebsd-versions.html

Jon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?412301F0.2070307>