Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:34:32 +0200 From: Sander Vesik <sander.vesik@gmail.com> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.org> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Assuming We Want FreeBSD to Grow: Who Is It For? Message-ID: <dcb2c27a050217123424ed0d84@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200502171233.j1HCXMRI036090@fire.jhs.private> References: <thomas.leveille@gmail.com> <a83b4fdf05021702151ae8b384@mail.gmail.com> <200502171233.j1HCXMRI036090@fire.jhs.private>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 13:33:22 +0100, Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.org> wrote: > > Much hot air on advocacy@ does not qualify. Let's > - Tell people to move to chat@freebsd.org. > - Report offenders to postmaster@freebsd.org for blocking. > - Request postmaster@freebsd.org appends to list definition: > "Not for arguing about what FreeBSD is or where it should go." > (developers on current@ etc, are unpaid, & advocacy@ people > have no right to direct what FreeBSD is & will be.) I think its hould be slightly more openly worded - for example, discussions (i mean rational discussions with technical details) of what FreeBSD is may be in some warranted - consider for example producing materials to promote the use of FreeBSD in embedded systems or similar. > > - > Julian Stacey Net & Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com > Mail in Ascii (Html=Spam). Ihr Rauch = mein allergischer Kopfschmerz. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?dcb2c27a050217123424ed0d84>