Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 11:22:28 -0700 From: Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: amd64/82178: missing 32bit subsystem Message-ID: <200506131122.28463.peter@wemm.org> In-Reply-To: <20050613071337.GA25893@ip.net.ua> References: <200506122320.j5CNKQAF023114@freefall.freebsd.org> <20050613021258.GA5242@dragon.NUXI.org> <20050613071337.GA25893@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 13 June 2005 12:13 am, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:12:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 11:20:26PM +0000, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> > > > > Actually this isn't correct for 5.4. > > There is a known issue that there are some missing bits in the 5.4 > > src/release/Makefile such that the 'base' tarball doesn't contain > > the 32-bit ld.so and 32-bit shared libs. > > This should be fixed in Makefile.inc1, not in release/Makefile. That looks a step in the right direction, but I wonder if we can have this stuff in a seperate sysinstall-selectable distribution instead of the base dist? Or is adding a conditional platform dist going to be hard? -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200506131122.28463.peter>