Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:10:06 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make -j as a stress test (was: Re: Quality of FreeBSD) [WARNING - 6.0-BETA1 still hosed!] Message-ID: <6.2.1.2.0.20050724190807.0640b750@64.7.153.2> In-Reply-To: <20050724181358.GB62041@FS.denninger.net> References: <20050722001253.GA70277@FS.denninger.net> <20050722013605.U16902@fledge.watson.org> <20050722010611.GA72234@FS.denninger.net> <42E0F93E.7000108@commit.it> <20050722194009.GA95692@FS.denninger.net> <20050723214450.A61837@fledge.watson.org> <20050724020136.GA16783@FS.denninger.net> <20050724034334.GA90851@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <20050724040055.GA18138@FS.denninger.net> <20050724175820.GA7735@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <20050724181358.GB62041@FS.denninger.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 02:13 PM 24/07/2005, Karl Denninger wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 24, 2005 at 07:58:20PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> > Most likely the bug you have run into is difficult or impossible to
> > reproduce on other hardware than the particular combination you are using.
>
>FWIW my earlier post about it appearing to work with only one disk on the
>chain was incorrect. It still fails - just takes longer (and more load).
The LINUX driver seems to kick the card into a lower UDMA mode to work
around a bug on that chip. Is this possible to do with your controller via
atacontrol ? There seemed to be a number of other bugs as well that needed
to be worked around too however.
---Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6.2.1.2.0.20050724190807.0640b750>