Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 22:51:33 +0100 From: Jochen Gensch <incmc@gmx.de> To: ticso@cicely.de, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Filesystem panic - one hd inaccessable under 6-STABLE Message-ID: <200511042251.33902.incmc@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <20051104212757.GD4813@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <200511042023.36498.incmc@gmx.de> <436BBB1C.1030900@centtech.com> <20051104212757.GD4813@cicely12.cicely.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am Freitag 04 November 2005 22:27 schrieb Bernd Walter: > If you have the filesystem on a slice (e.g. da0s1) and not a partition > (e.g. da0s1e) it shouldn't be an UFS one. I simply use the whole harddrive without subdividing partitions. Why souldn't that slice be ufs? > Then check with disklabel da0s1 what partitions you have and use the > 4.2BSD ones. disklabel da0s1 # /dev/da0s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] c: 320159322 0 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit As you can see, nothing left. However I don't know what it looked like before. I was able to mount da0s1 directly, so maybe there wasn't any partition anyway since I used the entire disk at once (I'm not that used to filesystem issues)? Jochen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200511042251.33902.incmc>