Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 13:08:49 +0100 From: Luk van den Borne <luktheluckyboy@gmail.com> To: Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Amarok + postgreSQL version Message-ID: <7b1df2440511130408g1d36e9d0t@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200511131006.55962.lofi@freebsd.org> References: <7b1df2440511111423u7495a644k@mail.gmail.com> <7b1df2440511130032r3bfd3f62j@mail.gmail.com> <7b1df2440511130045g6561460ay@mail.gmail.com> <200511131006.55962.lofi@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2005/11/13, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>: > On Sunday, 13. November 2005 09:45, Luk van den Borne wrote: > > When I deinstall postgresql74-server and try install > > postgresql81-server, I get this message: > > > > =3D=3D=3D> postgresql-server-8.1.0 is marked as broken: the port wants > > postgresql81-client but you have postgresql74-client installed. > > > > So I guess the version numbers do have to match. At least according to > > ports. > > Ah, you're running the server on the same machine. I assumed the host you= were > trying to run amarok on was client-only. > > -- > ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org > (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org > \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org > > > But that shouldn't really matter, should it? If I can run a different client remotely I should also be able to run another client locally, right? Or what is the philosophy behind this setup? That locally server and client version should match, in order to guarantee 100% compatibility (iow: admins should never be locked out in case of an unforseen interface breakage?). Or is it just a small bug in the Makefile? Anyway, running postgres8 now, thanks to the WANT_PGSQL_VER directive. Thank you!
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7b1df2440511130408g1d36e9d0t>