Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:17:06 +0100 From: Stanislaw Halik <weirdo@tehran.lain.pl> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: altq and max number of classes on xBSD Message-ID: <20051216161706.GA60338@tehran.lain.pl> In-Reply-To: <20051216154133.182bab4f.nikky@mnet.bg> References: <20051216154133.182bab4f.nikky@mnet.bg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nickola Kolev <nikky@mnet.bg> wrote: > Finally, my question is is there a way to raise the maximum number of > classes in a hierarchy (besides the artificial change in altq_hfsc.h > and altq_cbq.h)? How stable would a system like that be? there are no stability issues involved. and you don't have to change the limit in schedulers which you don't use. > If you have any suggestions for a setup, which can do the job of > traffic controlling /19 with a hierarchy of classes, each with > different guaranteed and maximum rates, I'd be very grateful. i'd suggest using HFSC scheduler, with CBQ you have no control over bandwidth borrowing. i've also heard about large and unnessesary packet delay (not present in HSFC), but nothing i could confirm myself. --=20 Stanis=B3aw Halik, http://tehran.lain.pl --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDouiCadU+vjT62TERAgcGAJ40ld1IzNR5oKWZkJDn0nc6LiZ8qACeIU5C 3owo1lUWO1eKoENXPxeLE30= =rX9l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --82I3+IH0IqGh5yIs--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051216161706.GA60338>