Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:17:47 -0500
From:      "Michael P. Soulier" <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: running ports openssh instead of the base
Message-ID:  <20060326041747.GJ12075@tigger.digitaltorque.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20060326041229.16A7033C23@mailserver5.hushmail.com>
References:  <20060326041229.16A7033C23@mailserver5.hushmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 26/03/06 Bob Goodman said:

> You will probably prefer to use security/openssh-portable.
> That port is more recent if I understand correctly,
> and is capable of replacing the base ssh automatically,
> thus making  it unnecessary to bug with rc.conf.
> "make config" will list the options.
> Hope this helps.

Thanks, I'll look at that too.

Mike

--=20
Michael P. Soulier <msoulier@digitaltorque.ca>
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It
takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite
direction." --Albert Einstein

--IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFEJhXrKGqCc1vIvggRArOZAJ0djictR5vWNzD0AGIOejJFIPteXQCdGQPT
sWZH3uvkBKigINIUh07vRac=
=Ixpp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--IR1Y5IvQhrKgS4e6--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060326041747.GJ12075>