Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 03 Jul 2006 10:15:56 +0400
From:      Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Sergey Matveychuk <sem@freebsd.org>,  dandee@volny.cz, ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD Port: portupgrade-2.1.3.2, 2 - help me please, the port in short time is broken again, what does it all mean ?
Message-ID:  <44A8B61C.6010003@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060703060759.GB51623@snoozy.vdgrift.org>
References:  <003201c69e25$43b56de0$6508280a@tocnet28.jspoj.czf> <44A8AFB7.5030304@FreeBSD.org> <20060703060759.GB51623@snoozy.vdgrift.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bert van de Grift wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2006 at 09:48:39AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
>> Daniel Dvor(a'k wrote:
>>>  
>>> Fixing the pkgdb.db does not help me at all.
>>>  
> 
>> It's a known issue.
> 
>> Just remove the file and /usr/ports/INDEX*.db and run portupgrade
>> again.  Note, it's described on man page - if you found pkgdb.db
>> seriously broken, just remove it.
> 
> I have the same problem after upgrading portupgrade but when I go back
> to the previous version (2.1.1,2) everything is ok...
> 

See my HANDS-UP message a couples days ago at the list.
Old (<=2.1.1,2) portupgrade use wrong (may be a right word will -
"unexpected") database format.

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44A8B61C.6010003>