Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:40:45 -0600
From:      Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
To:        Marcelo Gardini do Amaral <marcelo@registro.br>
Cc:        Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ed Maste <emaste@phaedrus.sandvine.ca>
Subject:   Re: How to setup polling on 'bge' interface
Message-ID:  <44C5223D.5010707@samsco.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060724193523.GB51092@registro.br>
References:  <20060711190908.GC69272@registro.br> <20060720023856.GA65960@sandvine.com> <20060720112613.GB716@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <44BFA2EE.7060308@samsco.org> <20060724193523.GB51092@registro.br>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
>>>The limited testing I've done on a Sun V20z at work suggests that you
>>>can get better routing throughput in interrupt mode than polling mode.
>>>YMMV and this is before tweaking the polling parameters.  (My testing
>>>also suggests that I don't really need to do any tweaking because
>>>the limiting factor is the gigabit interfaces rather than the V20z).
> 
> 
> I've noticed a higher (and variable) RTT with polling mode activated,
> without tweaking any parameters.
> 

Yes, the RTT will vary based on whether the interface has to wait a full
tick or only a partial tick for the polling loop to become active. 
Adaptive polling eliminates most of this variance.

Scott




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44C5223D.5010707>