Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 10:20:29 -0500 From: "Scot Hetzel" <swhetzel@gmail.com> To: "Divacky Roman" <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org, gerald@freebsd.org Subject: Re: emulators/linux-wine: Help in porting to FreeBSD Message-ID: <790a9fff0610140820v31d7373cja7e6fa4cb0497478@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20061014151708.GA8411@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> References: <790a9fff0610132255k5c3b08fcrb550fa308d31752d@mail.gmail.com> <20061014093916.GA88836@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20061014110039.GA92309@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> <20061014151708.GA8411@stud.fit.vutbr.cz>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/14/06, Divacky Roman <xdivac02@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 01:00:39PM +0200, Divacky Roman wrote: > > > we in fact dont implement this syscall. I just looked at what it does > > > and it doesnt look it its hard to implement... I might do it when time > > > permits (maybe today, maybe next year :) ) > > > > looks like I just partially implemented it.. > > > > pls test this: www.stud.fit.vutbr.cz/~xdivac02/linuxolator061014.patch > > > > I am interested if this helps the linux-wine at all. if it doesnt pls provide > > debuging prints from linuxolator compiled with -DDEBUG > > pls dont use this version... its wrong and panics system.. I am working on a > better solution.... > > > hopefully tomorrow I'll deliver it > Thanks for looking into this, I'll try your next patch. Scot -- DISCLAIMER: No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?790a9fff0610140820v31d7373cja7e6fa4cb0497478>