Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2006 11:41:12 +0200 From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance of Java on FBSD vs. others... Message-ID: <200612191141.12890.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> In-Reply-To: <20061219080444.GA1006@office.redwerk.com> References: <20061110203714.GA89006@ace.b020.ceid.upatras.gr> <20061218083751.T28249@turing> <20061219080444.GA1006@office.redwerk.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 =CE=A4=CF=81=CE=AF=CF=84=CE=B7 19 =CE=94=CE=B5=CE= =BA=CE=AD=CE=BC=CE=B2=CF=81=CE=B9=CE=BF=CF=82 2006 10:04, =CE=BF/=CE=B7 Eug= eny N Dzhurinsky =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 09:19:06AM -0800, Nick Johnson wrote: > > It should also be run with libthr as the > > threading library, as the consensus seems to be that this provides bett= er > > performance than libpthread (libkse). > > Very interesting. Could you please clarify how to use libthr on 5.5/6.2, > will there be a need to recompile everything? no just setup /etc/libmap.conf, like [/usr/local/diablo-jdk1.5.0/bin/java] libpthread.so.2 libthr.so.2 =2D-=20 Achilleas Mantzios
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200612191141.12890.achill>