Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:27:46 +1030 From: "Daniel O'Connor" <doconnor@gsoft.com.au> To: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.2 bge regression Message-ID: <200701301527.47546.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> In-Reply-To: <200701292132.26130.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> References: <200701291701.06906.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20070129094141.GD854@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <200701292132.26130.doconnor@gsoft.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart20176420.sZvEqOPFqa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Monday 29 January 2007 21:32, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Currently it's connected to a 10mbit hub :) > (Very crusty, I know) > > I've tried hard wiring it to 10BaseT/UTP but no change. I just dug out a spare switch (god knows why the hub was still in place) an= d=20 it works fine with that. I then tried the 6.1 system with the switch and it worked (duh) but when I= =20 went to switch back to the hub it wouldn't work.. I don't know how the 6.1 box worked with the hub since I can't get it to wo= rk=20 now, perhaps the hub is busted. So, in conclusion, I think bge(4) is OK :) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart20176420.sZvEqOPFqa Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBFvtBL5ZPcIHs/zowRAriLAJ9Oy6VemEae9U4rHSu0U31NGIDEygCfTmxL rmolCBz5zwGOSLpPfj4lQR4= =v7lN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart20176420.sZvEqOPFqa--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200701301527.47546.doconnor>