Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 07:10:16 +0000 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, allen paul <allen.paul72@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Ref : Permission to use parts of FreeBSD documentation on My Website Message-ID: <471706D8.1010604@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20071018110727.GD1563@kobe.laptop> References: <258baeb80710171334h62adb855gb0191e8c32f6d62a@mail.gmail.com> <47164479.5050604@gmail.com> <258baeb80710171430x43e4a319p18de1a21283d7088@mail.gmail.com> <471646D9.2020205@gmail.com> <20071018110727.GD1563@kobe.laptop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2007-10-17 17:31, "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote: > >> allen paul wrote: >> >>> Thank you, That was the peice of information I was looking for. >>> Sure, I will respect proper credits, and skip copyrighted >>> information. I might have been mistaken if I mistook BSD >>> documentation as freely distributed information under GNU license. >>> But, as long as I can post a few Kernel related excerpts, I think I >>> am good. >>> >> In general your going to find BSD a more permissive license then GPL >> (for sure less viral). Contact me privately if you need a good >> background references this as well other possible licensing options >> you may have. >> > > ... or ask here, on the freebsd-questions mailing list. There is no > reason why a discussion about the way the BSD license works would be > kept `private' in personal mailboxes :) > > I was discussing some alternative to GPLand BSD licenses for his project... I don't want to get accused of using -questions to "recruit"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?471706D8.1010604>