Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 19:40:33 -0700 From: Jay Chandler <lists@sequestered.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 7.0 and 6.3 Message-ID: <472153A1.4090301@sequestered.net> In-Reply-To: <20071026031924.38affb9a@gumby.homeunix.com.> References: <200710232143.14412.freysman@comcast.net> <471EF178.5050600@FreeBSD.org> <4720FD15.4000905@sequestered.net> <47210F08.3060403@FreeBSD.org> <4721349D.9050505@i19.se> <472135A3.2000809@sequestered.net> <20071026022013.06da2474@gumby.homeunix.com.> <472149E5.5070209@sequestered.net> <20071026031924.38affb9a@gumby.homeunix.com.>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
RW wrote: > On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:59:01 -0700 > Jay Chandler <lists@sequestered.net> wrote: > >> RW wrote: >>> On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:32:35 -0700 >>> Jay Chandler <lists@sequestered.net> wrote: >>> >>>> Johan Andersson wrote: >>>>> On 10/25/2007 11:47 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote: >>>>> Any good oneliner for rebuild all the ports that you recommend? >>>> portupgrade -afO >>>> >>> Personally I prefer >>> >>> portupgrade -f '<2007-10-25 11:00' >>> >>> since it's restartable. >> You don't have to throw the -O flag in there to keep various ports >> from complaining? > > > The point of -O is to have portupgrade save a few seconds by omitting > sanity-checking if pkgdb has already been run. It's not intended > for hiding problems. Okay, I'll buy that. I just tried it, and it worked. I distinctly remember a port (mailscanner-mrtg, but there are others) who choked on the fact that Apache1.3 isn't the same thing as Apache2.2 until I fed it the O flag... -- Jay Chandler / KB1JWQ Living Legend / Systems Exorcist Today's Excuse: Melting hard drives
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?472153A1.4090301>