Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 22 Apr 2008 19:00:35 +0400
From:      Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@freebsd.org>
To:        Mikhail Teterin <mteterin@mlp.com>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, naddy@freebsd.org, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: lzma (Re: HEADS UP: upgrading ImageMagick to 6.4.0-6)
Message-ID:  <20080422150030.GI54610@amilo.cenkes.org>
In-Reply-To: <200804221021.45834.mteterin@mlp.com>
References:  <200804151709.03452.mi%2Bmill@aldan.algebra.com> <20080421194224.GA21205@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20080422103434.GE54610@amilo.cenkes.org> <200804221021.45834.mteterin@mlp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:21:45AM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> =D0=B2=D1=96=D0=B2=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80=D0=BE=D0=BA 22 =D0=BA=D0=B2=D1=96=D1=
=82=D0=B5=D0=BD=D1=8C 2008 06:34 =D0=B4=D0=BE, Andrew Pantyukhin =D0=92=D0=
=B8 =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB=D0=B8:
> > So I guess we'll have to stick to using lzma from ports for now.
>=20
> Well, we lived with bzip2 from ports for quite a while...
>=20
> The real problem with lzma right now is that lzmautils (already marked as=
=20
> incompatible with lzma) installs its own lzma executable, with incompatib=
le=20
> command-line arguments :-(
>=20
> Maybe, instead of marking the ports as mutually incompatible, one of them=
=20
> could be modified to install executables under different names?..

We had a talk with naddy about it, but since there are people
using archivers/lzma with whatever syntax it has, in scripted
environments, I'm inclined not to surprise them very much. I
think a wrapper can be added to lzmautils for full
backwards-compatibility, I may look at it later.

Also, the lzmautils website claims it's of alpha-quality, so I'm
also hesitant to rely on it completely. At any rate, I think
having a reference implementation of lzma util in ports is a good
thing. OTOH, changing lzmautils' lzma to another name would
probably confuse gtar (I'm not sure though).



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080422150030.GI54610>