Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 04 May 2008 17:18:23 -0700
From:      perryh@pluto.rain.com
To:        tijl@ulyssis.org
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: wine: notepad OK, others not
Message-ID:  <481e524f.P93J5%2BbBb92APNoU%perryh@pluto.rain.com>
In-Reply-To: <200805041409.51904.tijl@ulyssis.org>
References:  <47ba7e1f.UDwudqHevRDrsQ8d%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <200804281503.33922.tijl@ulyssis.org> <4816bbdd.lbQT9XZN0V0Ecl9s%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <200805041409.51904.tijl@ulyssis.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> Wine has its own simple version of Wordpad though.
> >> Just run "wine wordpad".
> > 
> > This version has its own notepad, but it doesn't appear to have
> > wordpad.  (There's no "wordpad.exe" that I can find, but there
> > are two identical copies of "notepad.exe" -- one in .../windows
> > and the other in .../windows/system32.)
>
> "wine wordpad" still works though. It's in /usr/local/lib/wine.

Along with yet another notepad, this one twice the size of the ones
in .../windows and .../windows/system32!  The obvious followup is
which one actually gets used if someone runs "wine notepad", but
I doubt it's worth looking into.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?481e524f.P93J5%2BbBb92APNoU%perryh>