Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 01:06:12 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <yanefbsd@gmail.com> To: Jonathan McKeown <jonathan+freebsd-hackers@hst.org.za> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Idea for FreeBSD Message-ID: <61273574-0EE4-4D24-A543-C9AC38ED66B0@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200808121414.44139.jonathan%2Bfreebsd-hackers@hst.org.za> References: <78086795e6ab9676870368dcebb57b37.squirrel@secure.futurecis.com> <78cb3d3f0808120503t3e2c7d68n1d4383c98aa41e10@mail.gmail.com> <200808121414.44139.jonathan%2Bfreebsd-hackers@hst.org.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Aug 12, 2008, at 5:14 AM, Jonathan McKeown wrote: > On Tuesday 12 August 2008 14:03:30 Adrian Penisoara wrote: >> While we're at it, I wish we could leverage the posibility for the >> admin to manually start the service at the CLI, no matter whether the >> service has been enabled or not -- that is the "<svc>_enable" keyword >> should have effect only in the bootup/automatic contexts. > > Isn't this what onestart does? > > Jonathan I may be a bit late into the conversation, but for what it's worth upstart does have some positive features in the 0.5.0 version (the one that just rolled off the SVN train recently). Their use of simple and complex job start criteria and the ability to link in process monitoring functionality via DBUS clients is interesting... albeit not necessary except in high availability environments. -Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?61273574-0EE4-4D24-A543-C9AC38ED66B0>