Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 11:11:50 +0700 From: Sharkie <shark.fin.soup@mac.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Cc: Kees Jan Koster <kjkoster@kjkoster.org>, Havard Eidnes <he@uninett.no> Subject: Re: Why cannot I allocate more than -Xmx700M Message-ID: <FAC14446-C38F-435A-BE68-91E3DDD997CB@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <20080819.223614.66313564.he@uninett.no> References: <48AA6E00.7040408@irfu.se> <728977D1-FDFA-495B-80D3-D9D060FA5082@mac.com> <3CD88297-2C6A-4E1C-A114-002599898B91@kjkoster.org> <20080819.223614.66313564.he@uninett.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Well, now it's now really interesting. I made a typo in my previous post. Basically I have a 4GIG machine. But somehow I lost 1GIG and now have only 3. I am getting serviced =20 this Friday so will find out. That aside, I have 16GIG of SWAPSPACE, and 3GIG of actual RAM. I am still unable to allocate more than -Xmx700M FreeBSD or JAVA is not tapping into my swapspace? How do I check this =20= out? On Aug 20, 2008, at 3:36 AM, Havard Eidnes wrote: >>> I think I was 1 GIG of physical ram. I am getting service in for my >>> machine now. >> >> Strange. I have a box with 768MB RAM and it will happily allocate 1GB >> for a JVM. That is, I can run "Hello World" -Xmx1G and -Xmx1000M just >> fine. > > Surely, what matters is not the amount of physical ram in the box > (although "more is better" is a good rule of thumb :-), but the > total amount of virtual memory? I.e. the amount of configured > swap space also enters into the equation. > > Regards, > > - H=E5vard > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-=20 > unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?FAC14446-C38F-435A-BE68-91E3DDD997CB>