Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2008 23:34:43 -0800 From: Gabriele Cecchetti <gabriele.cecchetti@gmail.com> To: pyunyh@gmail.com Cc: Fabio Checconi <fabio@retis.sssup.it>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Panics and freeze using age0 Message-ID: <4913EF93.6010006@sssup.it> In-Reply-To: <20081107072201.GD11486@cdnetworks.co.kr> References: <49133B35.9040603@sssup.it> <20081107072201.GD11486@cdnetworks.co.kr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pyun YongHyeon ha scritto:
[...]
> Would you be more elaborate on this issue? Does it mean you have
> to manually up/down game with ifconfig(8) after boot?
Yes, I need to do that.
Sometimes happen that even if the interface
is showed during the bootlog, then it is not showed by ifconfig.
Typing ifconfig again show the interface.
Then I've to down/up the interface and/or ping outside, like the
interface was sleeping.
> > Anyone with similar experience ?
> > age0 driver is well tested for production enviroment or not ?
>
[...]
> > Is better to buy another Intel card and going on using em0 driver ?
>
> Remember, all hardwares supported by age(4) are for consumer
> motherboards. Even if L1 has much better performance/design than
> that of its successor, L1E, it's still not for server market.
> The same is true for em(4). Since there are too many variants you
> may have to choose the best hardware model that is suited for your
> workload.
The other card I'm using is:
em0@pci0:5:1:0: class=0x020000 card=0x13768086 chip=0x107c8086 rev=0x05
hdr=0x00
vendor = 'Intel Corporation'
device = 'PRO/1000 GT'
class = network
subclass = ethernet
So, which card is the best buy for the server market ?
Cheers
Gabriele
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4913EF93.6010006>