Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 12:14:03 +0300 From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de Cc: FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC: ATA to CAM integration patch Message-ID: <4A47345B.3030209@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20090628110433.519c758a@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <4A4517BE.9040504@FreeBSD.org> <20090627164406.155f002d@ernst.jennejohn.org> <4A46553C.4000504@FreeBSD.org> <20090628110433.519c758a@ernst.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Gary Jennejohn wrote: > Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> Gary Jennejohn wrote: >>> - remove atapicam from you kernel config file, otherwise the kernel >>> pancis in xpt (at least, mine did) >> Thank you for report. Problem is that atapicam provides fake emulated >> SPI transport, but not a native ATA in terms of updated CAM. Small >> attached patch fixes this for me: >> >> # camcontrol devlist >> <OCZ-VERTEX 1.30> at scbus0 target 0 lun 0 (pass0,ada0) >> <Slimtype DVD A DS8A1P CA11> at scbus3 target 0 lun 0 (cd0,pass1) >> > > Thanks a lot. This patch fixed the problem for me too. > > Any plans to update your original patch? Sure I will in few days. Just not after every single change. I am still investigating this issue to find real crash reason, that was triggered by this mistake. -- Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A47345B.3030209>