Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:03:35 -0600
From:      Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, lists@rhavenn.net
Subject:   Re: ntpd not removed; WITHOUT_NTP enabled in src.conf
Message-ID:  <790a9fff1001091003u679542dbh3a5eec232318cbc6@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201001091322.o09DMjgZ041660@lurza.secnetix.de>
References:  <20100109124608.GA28238@slackbox.xs4all.nl> <201001091322.o09DMjgZ041660@lurza.secnetix.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/9/10, Oliver Fromme <olli@lurza.secnetix.de> wrote:
>  There's another pitfall:  When you install, say, BIND from
>  the ports collection with the option WITH_REPLACE_BASE=true
>  and add WITHOUT_BIND=yes to src.conf.  When you update your
>  world it will wipe out your BIND files that were installed
>  from ports, so you have to re-install the port.  I haven't
>  tried this myself, though ...  Maybe there's a safety-belt
>  somewhere.
>
Currently, there is no safety belt to protect from deleting the BIND files.

I created this simple patch to OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc that will
prevent the deleting of the BIND Files when the BIND port is installed
using WITH_REPLACE_BASE:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=142529

Scot



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?790a9fff1001091003u679542dbh3a5eec232318cbc6>