Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 12:55:39 +0100 From: RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: squidguard and squid3 Message-ID: <20100426125539.5c797084@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20100426085054.GA20779@megatron.madpilot.net> References: <8D801F2C-AE12-455D-ADFF-C065F8B3E59F@goldmark.org> <20100426085054.GA20779@megatron.madpilot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:50:54 +0200 Guido Falsi <mad@madpilot.net> wrote: > For the list: Is there some reason why the default squid port is still > version 2.7? What is the consensus on this? Squid 3.0 was a rewrite of squid in C++ with a reduced feature set. I think the current situation is that there are still features in 2.x that aren't in 3.x and vice versa. 2.7 has better performance, so I think it's still a sensible default. > Also, should the port provide some switch to choose on which squid > version to depend Probably
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100426125539.5c797084>