Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 01 May 2010 21:50:23 -0600 (MDT)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        ed@80386.nl
Cc:        Alexander@Leidinger.net, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [Extension] utmpx and LOGIN_FAILURE
Message-ID:  <20100501.215023.353672579433532204.imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100501235846.GU56080@hoeg.nl>
References:  <20100501203244.GT56080@hoeg.nl> <20100501205625.GB36980@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20100501235846.GU56080@hoeg.nl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <20100501235846.GU56080@hoeg.nl>
            Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> writes:
: * Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@acm.org> wrote:
: > On 2010-May-01 22:32:44 +0200, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> wrote:
: > >* Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> wrote:
: > >> Does this default to on or off or is this always on? If the later: some
: > >> kind of a switch (no matter what the default is) would be highly
: > >> desired.
: > >
: > >What about adding a switch to last(1) to (un)hide the entries?
: > 
: > That doesn't cover the DoS potential of logging this data in the
: > firstplace.
: 
: So how is this covered right now? As far as I know, all of our existing
: login services write messages to /var/log/*.

newsyslog rotates those files when they get too big...

Warner



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100501.215023.353672579433532204.imp>