Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:48:04 +0200 From: Erik Cederstrand <erik@cederstrand.dk> To: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dwb : groff replacement proposal Message-ID: <877EF62B-D2BE-422F-8545-DBC63E5AA682@cederstrand.dk> In-Reply-To: <20100630170757.GA52509@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <4C2AB793.4040601@laposte.net> <20100630034622.GA48794@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4C2B11A9.4020206@laposte.net> <4C2B6922.6090300@elischer.org> <20100630170757.GA52509@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--Apple-Mail-4--1031225403 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Den 30/06/2010 kl. 19.07 skrev Steve Kargl: >=20 > The fact remains that there is no available alternative that > contains the functionality of groff. I still can't read from this discussion if FreeBSD base actually needs = all the functionality that groff provides, and if the proposed = alternatives are lacking needed functionality which cannot be worked = around by simple changes to the distributed man-pages like the ones = committed in the last weeks. I may be horribly misinformed, but man-page rendering does seem like a = fairly simple task. Erik= --Apple-Mail-4--1031225403--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?877EF62B-D2BE-422F-8545-DBC63E5AA682>