Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Jul 2010 11:46:27 -0700
From:      Freddie Cash <fjwcash@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [HEADSUP] ZFS version 15 committed to head
Message-ID:  <AANLkTikvy2Afe5ZYf75O908gtEgvtAuv1E6NmnHJOg6C@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20100717182133.GA63078@lordsith.net>
References:  <4C3C7202.7090103@FreeBSD.org> <20100717101459.GA13626@lordsith.net> <9E4FCF4C-7A69-426E-9F39-B5487D4CB07C@lassitu.de> <20100717105134.GB13626@lordsith.net> <AANLkTikusWLS-3lZpY62cw2XxTdAQTG5KtFfrU29hG_W@mail.gmail.com> <20100717182133.GA63078@lordsith.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Marco van Lienen
<marco+freebsd-current@lordsith.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 10:12:10AM -0700, you (Freddie Cash) sent the fol=
lowing to the -current list:
>> >
>> > I have read many things about those differences, but why then does zfs=
 on opensolaris report more available space whereas FreeBSD does not?
>> > That would imply that my friend running osol build 117 couldn't fill u=
p his raidz pool past the 3.56T.
>>
>> You used different commands to check the disk space on OSol (zpool vs df=
).
>>
>> Try the same commands on both FreeBSD and OSol (zpool and zfs) and
>> you'll see the same results.
>
> I guess you missed my original mail of this thread in which I also showed=
 the output of 'zfs list -r pool2' on osol where clearly there is more avai=
lable space shown then on FreeBSD.
>
> % zfs list -r pool2
> NAME =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A0 =C2=A0USED =C2=A0AVAIL =C2=A0REFER =C2=A0MOUNTPOINT
> pool2 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=
=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =
=C2=A03.32T =C2=A02.06T =C2=A03.18T =C2=A0/export/pool2

No, I saw that.  But you compared zpool and zfs output on FreeBSD, and
zfs and df output on OSol.  IOW, you didn't compare the same things.

Compare the output of zpool and zfs on both FreeBSD and OSol, it
should be the same.

--=20
Freddie Cash
fjwcash@gmail.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AANLkTikvy2Afe5ZYf75O908gtEgvtAuv1E6NmnHJOg6C>