Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:12:26 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Ladan?= <rene@freebsd.org> To: Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@Leidinger.net> Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/linux-[f10-]procps (was: [cfr] patch to clean up old Linux ports) Message-ID: <513E48BA.4090001@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20130311211022.0000342a@unknown> References: <513A0C04.8090907@freebsd.org> <20130309121625.00004279@unknown> <513BA4AE.4000802@freebsd.org> <20130309233148.00004ad1@unknown> <513DA84C.20102@freebsd.org> <20130311211022.0000342a@unknown>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11-03-2013 21:10, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Mon, 11 Mar 2013 10:47:56 +0100 > René Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> wrote: > >> I also noted PR ports/169988 containing a patch to update >> sysutils/linux-procps to a Fedora 10 version, we might apply that >> instead of just deleting it. > Decide yourself: > - Does something depend upon this which still exists after the fc4 > ports are deleted? No, since sysutils/linux-procps is scheduled to be deleted. > - Does it provide something (if updated) which is not available in > FreeBSD? It provides these binaries not in the FreeBSD base: free, pmap, pwdx, skill, slabtop, snice, tload > If the answer to both is "no", we should delete. > So it depends on the usefulness of the above binaries. Rene
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?513E48BA.4090001>